Teaching design

What can I do?

Impact
This is some text inside of a div block.
Quality
This is some text inside of a div block.
  1. Give students opportunities to practice and give them feedback along the way until they demonstrate mastery - not simply competence - on tasks [1]
  2. Have students work together [1]
  3. Give students as much or as little time as they need to master tasks (avoid setting time limits) [1]
  4. Set clear learning goals (learning objectives) at the start and provide targeted activities that help students achieve these learning goals [1]

What is this about?

Mastery learning is an instructional approach in which the educator helps students to achieve a deep understanding and mastery of the material before moving on to new content. This can be achieved in a number of ways, including:

  • Setting clear learning objectives and breaking the material down into smaller, manageable chunks
  • Providing students with explicit and systematic instruction, such as through lectures, demonstrations, or step-by-step instructions
  • Giving students frequent and timely feedback on their progress, and allowing them to revise and practice until they have mastered the material
  • Providing students with additional support and resources as needed, such as one-on-one tutoring or access to online materials

In a mastery learning environment, the educator's role is to provide students with the support and resources they need to succeed, rather than simply evaluating or grading their performance. The focus is on helping students to achieve a deep understanding and mastery of the material, rather than just passing a test or meeting a minimum standard. This approach can be particularly beneficial for students who may struggle with certain concepts or skills, as it allows them to work at their own pace and receive the support they need to succeed.

What's the evidence say?

Mastery learning (through deliberate practice) had the largest effect on learning in clinical education ➕➕➕➕➕ [1]. Similarly, small group learning, setting learning objectives, worked examples, and play programs had large effects on learning in clinical education ➕➕➕➕➕ [1]. Additional strategies that had a moderate effect on learning included questioning, concept mapping, meta-cognitive strategies, visual-perception programs, and teaching strategies ➕➕➕➕ [1].

What's the underlying theory?

The underlying theory behind mastery learning is the idea that students learn best when they are given the time and support they need to fully understand and master the material. This theory is based on the idea that students learn more effectively when they are able to practice and revise the material until they have mastered it, rather than simply moving on to new material before they have fully understood the previous content.

One key theory that supports mastery learning is the Cognitive Load Theory, which suggests that learning is more effective when the cognitive load of the learner is within their capacity, as this allows them to process and retain the material more efficiently. By breaking the material down into smaller chunks and providing students with the time and support they need to fully understand and master each chunk, mastery learning can help to reduce cognitive load and improve learning and retention.

Another key theory that supports mastery learning is the Self-Efficacy Theory, which suggests that students' belief in their own ability to succeed (self-efficacy) plays a key role in their motivation and learning. By providing students with frequent and timely feedback, and by allowing them to revise and practice until they have mastered the material, mastery learning can help students to see their progress and feel more confident in their abilities, which can enhance motivation and learning.

Where does the evidence come from?

This evidence summary is based on one meta-analysis [1] that focuses on effective teaching-learning factors in clinical education. The meta-analysis included 132 articles examining 16 teaching-learning factors and represented a variety of clinical education settings yet only 25 of these included studies were RCTs. No risk of bias was conducted yet the effect sizes for mastery learning, small group learning and learning goals were large, therefore risk of bias is unlikely to shift the findings considerably. The authors did not provide a measure of heterogeneity or provide any information on publication bias.

References

  1. Huang, P. H., Haywood, M., O’Sullivan, A., & Shulruf, B. (2019). A meta-analysis for comparing effective teaching in clinical education. Medical Teacher, 41(10), 1129-1142.

Additional Resources